Animal Reproduction (AR)
https://animal-reproduction.org/article/doi/10.1590/1984-3143-AR2020-0020
Animal Reproduction (AR)
Thematic Section: 36th Annual Meeting of the Association of Embryo Technology in Europe (AETE)

A review of simulation analyses of economics and genetics for the use of in-vitro produced embryos and artificial insemination in dairy herds

Albert De Vries; Karun Kaniyamattam

Downloads: 0
Views: 82

Abstract

Abstract: The use of in-vitro produced (IVP) embryo transfer (ET) in dairy herds is growing fast. Much of this growth is on dairy farms where the focus is on milk production and not on selling breeding stock. The value of implementing IVP-ET in a dairy herd arises from a higher genetic merit of the IVP-embryo, but the cost to produce a pregnancy with an IVP embryo is greater than the cost of artificial insemination (AI). The first objective of this study was to review estimates of the net benefit of using IVP-ET over AI in dairy herds using existing literature. Another objective was to show how much IVP-ET use in a herd is optimal. Most of the literature is based on simulation modeling, including our own work that focuses on the dairy industry in the USA. We found that the most profitable use of AI and IVP-ET is often a combination of the two. More IVP-ET should be used when the value of surplus calves is greater and the cost of IVP-ET is lower, among many other factors. In the future, use of IVP-ET will be further improved by more accurately identifying superior donors and recipients, reducing the generation interval, and achieving greater efficiency in embryo production.

Keywords

embryo transfer, dairy, profitability, genetic lag

References

Bonilla L, Block J, Denicol AC, Hansen PJ. Consequences of transfer of an in vitro-produced embryo for the dam and resultant calf. J Dairy Sci. 2014;97(1):229-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-6943. PMid:24210495.

Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding – CDCB. Genetic and phenotypic trend. Bowie, MD: CDCB; 2019 [cited 2019 Jul 28]. Available from: https://queries.uscdcb.com/eval/summary/trend.cfm

De Vries A, Kaniyamattam K. Economic and genetic performance of in vitro produced embryo transfer and artificial insemination programs. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting Dairy Cattle Reproduction Council Conference; Pittsburgh, PA; 2019 Nov 13-14. New Prague, MN: DCRC; 2019. p. 59-70

Dechow CD, Rogers GW. Short communication: genetic lag represents commercial herd genetic merit more accurately than the 4-path selection model. J Dairy Sci. 2018;101(5):4312-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13571. PMid:29454682.

Ealy AD, Wooldridge LK, McCoski SR. Board Invited Review: post-transfer consequences of in vitro-produced embryos in cattle. J Anim Sci. 2019;97(6):2555-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jas/skz116. PMid:30968113.

Ferré LB, Kjelland ME, Strøbech LB, Hyttel P, Mermillod P, Ross PJ. Review: recent advances in bovine in vitro embryo production: reproductive biotechnology history and methods. Animal. 2020;14(5):991-1004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731119002775. PMid:31760966.

Goszczynski DE, Cheng H, Demyda-Peyrás S, Medrano JF, Wu J, Ross PJ. In vitro breeding: application of embryonic stem cells to animal production. Biol Reprod. 2019;100(4):885-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biolre/ioy256. PMid:30551176.

Hansen PJ. Current and emerging reproductive technologies useful for genetic improvement. In: Beede DK, editor. Large dairy herd management. 3rd ed. Champaign, IL: ADSA; 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/ldhm.0744.

Kaniyamattam K, Block J, Hansen PJ, De Vries A. Comparison between an exclusive in vitro-produced embryo transfer system and artificial insemination for genetic, technical, and financial herd performance. J Dairy Sci. 2017;100(7):5729-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11979. PMid:28457554.

Kaniyamattam K, Block J, Hansen PJ, De Vries A. Economic and genetic performance of various combinations of in vitro-produced embryo transfers and artificial insemination in a dairy herd. J Dairy Sci. 2018;101(2):1540-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13475. PMid:29153526.

Kaniyamattam K, Elzo MA, Cole JB, De Vries A. Stochastic dynamic simulation modeling including multitrait genetics to estimate genetic, technical, and financial consequences of dairy farm reproduction and selection strategies. J Dairy Sci. 2016;99(10):8187-202. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11136. PMid:27497901.

Lush JL. Animal breeding plans. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State Press; 1937

Moore SG, Hasler JFA. 100-Year Review: reproductive technologies in dairy science. J Dairy Sci. 2017;100(12):10314-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13138. PMid:29153167.

National Association of Animal Breeders – NAAB. Semen sales report 2019-2018. Madison: NAAB; 2020 [cited 2020 Apr 25]. Available from: https://www.naab-css.org/semen-sales

Parker Gaddis KL, Dikmen S, Null DJ, Cole JB, Hansen PJ. Evaluation of genetic components in traits related to superovulation, in vitro fertilization, and embryo transfer in Holstein cattle. J Dairy Sci. 2017;100(4):2877-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11907. PMid:28131573.

Ribeiro ES, Galvão KN, Thatcher WW, Santos JEP. Economic aspects of applying reproductive technologies to dairy herds. Anim Reprod. 2012;9:370-87.

Sanches BV, Zangirolamo AF, Seneda NN. Intensive use of IVF by large-scale dairy programs. Anim Reprod. [serial on the Internet]. 2019 [cited 2019 Oct 13];16(3), 394-401. Available from: https://www.animal-reproduction.org/article/10.21451/1984-3143-AR2019-0058/pdf/animreprod-16-3-394.pdf

Schmitt MR, VanRaden PM, De Vries A. Ranking sires using genetic selection indices based on financial investment methods versus lifetime net merit. J Dairy Sci. 2019;102(10):9060-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-16081. PMid:31378490.

Siqueira LGB, Dikmen S, Ortega MS, Hansen PJ. Postnatal phenotype of dairy cows is altered by in vitro embryo production using reverse X-sorted semen. J Dairy Sci. 2017;100(7):5899-908. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-12539. PMid:28456408.

Stewart BM, Block J, Morelli P, Navarette AE, Amstalden M, Bonilla L, Hansen PJ, Bilby TR. Efficacy of embryo transfer in lactating dairy cows during summer using fresh or vitrified embryos produced in vitro with sex-sorted semen. J Dairy Sci. 2011;94(7):3437-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-4008. PMid:21700029.

Thomasen J, Willam A, Egger-Danner C, Sørensen AC. Reproductive technologies combine well with genomic selection in dairy breeding programs. J Dairy Sci. 2016;99(2):1331-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-9437. PMid:26686703.

VanRaden PM, Cole JB, Parker Gaddis KL. Net merit as a measure of lifetime profit: 2018 revision. USDA-AIP Research Report NM$7 (5-18). USA: USDA.gov; 2018. [cited 2019 Sep 8]. Available from: https://aipl.arsusda.gov/reference/nmcalc-2018.htm

Viana JHM. 2018 Statistics of embryo production and transfer in domestic farm animals. Embryo Transfer Newsletter. [serial on the Internet]. 2019 [cited 2019 Oct 13];36:8-25. [cited 2020 Apr 25]. Available from: https://www.iets.org/pdf/comm_data/IETS_Data_Retrieval_Report_2018.pdf

Weigel K. Should I consider genomics and IVF?. In: Proceedings of the Western Dairy Management Conference; 2019; Reno, USA: WDMC; 2019 [cited 2019 Sep 8]. Available from: http://wdmc.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Weigel-Kent.pdf. 2019

Weigel K. Using genomics on the farm. In: Proceedings of the Western Dairy Management Conference; 2011; Reno, Nevada. USA: WDMC; 2011. p. 127-139 [cited 2019 Oct 13]. Available from: http://wdmc.org/2011/Using%20Genomics%20on%20the%20Farm%20pg%20127-139.pdf

Weigel KA, Hoffman PC, Herring W, Lawlor TJ Jr. Potential gains in lifetime net merit from genomic testing of cows, heifers, and calves on commercial dairy farms. J Dairy Sci. 2012;95(4):2215-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4877. PMid:22459867.
 


Submitted date:
03/09/2020

Accepted date:
04/29/2020

5f36dfab0e8825e953587299 animreprod Articles
Links & Downloads

Anim Reprod

Share this page
Page Sections