A simple and rapid evaluation of boar sperm quality using the resazurin colorimetric assay

Fung-Hsiang Chu; Yu-Hsin Chen; Ting-Chieh Kang; Lih-Ren Chen; Hsiu-Lien Herbie Lin

doi:10.1590/1984-3143-AR2024-0005

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

A simple and rapid evaluation of boar sperm quality using the resazurin colorimetric assay

Fung-Hsiang Chu; Yu-Hsin Chen; Ting-Chieh Kang; Lih-Ren Chen; Hsiu-Lien Herbie Lin

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1984-3143-AR2024-0005 Anim Reprod, vol.22, n1, e20240005, 2025

PDF

Downloads: 0

Abstract

Ensuring boar sperm quality before insemination is crucial for maximizing field fertility and efficient pig production. The computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) and fluorescence probes combined with flow cytometry (FC) are commonly used techniques for evaluating sperm kinematics and functions, closely related to animal fertility. However, their high cost and complex operations make it challenging to apply them in laboratories or pig breeding farms with limited resources. Here, our aim was to develop a new protocol using a resazurin redox dye to assess boar sperm quality for practical application. We first created simulated semen samples with different levels of sperm quality (0, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100%) at concentrations of 300 and 150 × 10⁶ cells/mL. Subsequently, the simulated semen was used to establish an optimal standard protocol based on the results of the resazurin colorimetric assay. Finally, the condition that showed the strongest correlation between resazurin redox rate and sperm parameters was selected to perform a linear regression test. Two optimal working conditions were identified, involved incubating 10 µL of resazurin reagent with 100 µL of semen for either 20 or 40 min, depending on the sperm concentration of either 300 or 150 × 10⁶ cells/mL. We subsequently conducted a linear regression analysis using data that included the resazurin reaction rate and measurements of sperm parameters. Finally, we obtained two sets of five equations, allowing directly convert the absorbance of the resazurin assay into values for sperm quality parameters. These parameters include total motility, progressive motility, viability, acrosome integrity, and mitochondrial activity. This new protocol is valuable for sperm evaluation because it is cost-effective, time-efficient, and labor-saving.

Keywords

boar, computer-assisted sperm analysis, flow cytometry, resazurin, resorufin, sperm

References

Alamo A, De Luca C, Mongioì LM, Barbagallo F, Cannarella R, La Vignera S, Calogero AE, Condorelli RA. Mitochondrial membrane potential predicts 4-hour sperm motility. Biomedicines. 2020;8(7):196. http://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines8070196. PMid:32645820.

Aziz DM. Assessment of bovine sperm viability by MTT reduction assay. Anim Reprod Sci. 2006;92(1–2):1-8. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2005.05.029. PMid:16023310.

Berridge MV, Herst PM, Tan AS. Tetrazolium dyes as tools in cell biology: new insights into their cellular reduction. Biotechnol Annu Rev (Amst). 2005;11:127-52. http://doi.org/10.1016/S1387-2656(05)11004-7. PMid:16216776.

Boe-Hansen GB, Satake N. An update on boar semen assessments by flow cytometry and CASA. Theriogenology. 2019;137(1):93-103. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2019.05.043. PMid:31200933.

Chen YH, Wu CP, Lin HL, Liaw RB, Lai YY, Wu MC, Chen LR, Tsai PSJ. Tetrazolium salt WST-8 as a novel and reliable chromogenic indicator for the assessment of boar semen quality. Animals (Basel). 2020;10(12):2293. http://doi.org/10.3390/ani10122293. PMid:33291566.

Csepregi R, Lemli B, Kunsági-Máté S, Szente L, Koszegi T, Németi B, Poór M. Complex formation of resorufin and resazurin with b-cyclodextrins: can cyclodextrins interfere with a resazurin cell viability assay? Molecules. 2018;23(2):382. http://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23020382. PMid:29439432.

Dart MG, Mesta J, Crenshaw C, Ericsson SA. Modified resazurin reduction test for determining the fertility potential of bovine spermatozoa. Arch Androl. 1994;33(2):71-5. http://doi.org/10.3109/01485019408987806. PMid:7818374.

Datlow LY, Leventhal M, King J, Wallace TC. Consumption patterns and the nutritional contribution of total, processed, fresh, and fresh-lean pork to the U.S. Nutrients. 2023;15(11):2595. http://doi.org/10.3390/nu15112595. PMid:37299558.

Dias TR, Cho CL, Agarwal A. Sperm assessment: traditional approaches and their indicative value. In Nagy ZP, Varghese AC, Agarwal A, editors. Vitro fertilization: a textbook of current and emerging methods and devices. Cham: Springer; 2019. p. 249-263. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43011-9_22.

FAO. Meat Market Review: emerging trends and outlook. Rome: FAO; 2022

Gallon F, Marchetti C, Jouy N, Marchetti P. The functionality of mitochondria differentiates human spermatozoa with high and low fertilizing capability. Fertil Steril. 2006;86(5):1526-30. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.03.055. PMid:16996512.

Gillan L, Evans G, Maxwell WMC. Flow cytometric evaluation of sperm parameters in relation to fertility potential. Theriogenology. 2005;63(2):445-57. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.09.024. PMid:15626410.

Glass RH, Ericsson SA, Ericsson RJ, Drouin MT, Marcoux LJ, Sullivan H. The resazurin reduction test provides an assessment of sperm activity. Fertil Steril. 1991;56(4):743-6. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)54609-3. PMid:1915952.

Henning H, Nguyen QT, Wallner U, Waberski D. Temperature limits for storage of extended boar semen from the perspective of the sperm’s energy status. Front Vet Sci. 2022;9:953021. http://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.953021. PMid:35990258.

Jung M, Rudiger K, Schulze M. In vitro measures for assessing boar semen fertility. Reprod Domest Anim. 2015;50(Suppl 2):20-4. http://doi.org/10.1111/rda.12533. PMid:26174915.

Knox RV. Artificial insemination in pigs today. Theriogenology. 2016;85(1):83-93. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.07.009. PMid:26253434.

Lavogina D, Lust H, Tahk MJ, Laasfeld T, Vellama H, Nasirova N, Vardja M, Eskla KL, Salumets A, Rinken A, Jaal J. Revisiting the resazurin‐based sensing of cellular viability: widening the application horizon. Biosensors (Basel). 2022;12(4):196. http://doi.org/10.3390/bios12040196. PMid:35448256.

Lin HL, Liaw RB, Chen YH, Kang TC, Lin DY, Chen LR, Wu MC. Evaluation of cockerel spermatozoa viability and motility by a novel enzyme based cell viability assay. Br Poult Sci. 2019;60(4):467-71. http://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2018.1426832. PMid:29355473.

López Rodríguez A, Rijsselaere T, Vyt P, Van Soom A, Maes D. Effect of dilution temperature on boar semen quality. Reprod Domest Anim. 2012;47(5):e63-6. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2011.01938.x. PMid:22066836.

Marchetti C, Obert G, Deffosez A, Formstecher P, Marchetti P. Study of mitochondrial membrane potential, reactive oxygen species, DNA fragmentation and cell viability by flow cytometry in human sperm. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(5):1257-65. http://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/17.5.1257. PMid:11980749.

Maside C, Recuero S, Salas-Huetos A, Ribas-Maynou J, Yeste M. Animal board invited review: an update on the methods for semen quality evaluation in swine – from farm to the lab. Animal. 2023;17(3):100720. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2023.100720. PMid:36801527.

Mocé E, Graham JK. In vitro evaluation of sperm quality. Anim Reprod Sci. 2008;105(1–2):104-18. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2007.11.016. PMid:18178345.

Morgan DM. Tetrazolium (MTT) assay for cellular viability and activity. Methods Mol Biol. 1998;79:179-83. http://doi.org/10.1385/0-89603-448-8:179. PMid:9463833.

Namuncura C, Sánchez R, Pezo F, Uribe P, Navarro P, Zambrano F. Rest days and storage of boar semen at 17°C: effect on motility and sperm concentration. Andrologia. 2020;52(6):e13578. http://doi.org/10.1111/and.13578. PMid:32227514.

Quirino M, Pereira VN, Tamanini MSC, Ulguim RR, Schulze M, Mellagi APG, Bortolozzo FP. Sperm concentration of boar semen doses and sperm quality: novel perspectives based on the extender type and sperm resilience. Anim Reprod Sci. 2023;255:107293. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2023.107293. PMid:37413853.

Reddy KVR, Kedar NG, Vadigoppula AD, Bordekar A, Meherji PK, Hansotia M. Evaluation of resazurin reduction test results and their correlation with conventional semen parameters: A large scale study. J Endocrinol Reprod. 1998;2(1):1-11.

Rodriguez AL, Van Soom A, Arsenakis I, Maes D. Boar management and semen handling factors affect the quality of boar extended semen. Porcine Health Manag. 2017;3(1):15. http://doi.org/10.1186/s40813-017-0062-5. PMid:28770098.

Sa S-J, Kim I-C, Choi S-H, Hong J-K, Kim D-W, Cho K-H, Kim Y-H, Chung K-H, Park J-C. Effects of storage in different commercial semen extenders on sperm motility, viability and membrane integrity of Korean Native Boar Spermatozoa. J Embryo Transf. 2013;28(4):349-53. http://doi.org/10.12750/JET.2013.28.4.349.

Schäfer-Somi S, Aurich C. Use of a new computer-assisted sperm analyzer for the assessment of motility and viability of dog spermatozoa and evaluation of four different semen extenders for predilution. Anim Reprod Sci. 2007;102(1–2):1-13. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2005.03.019. PMid:17045428.

Sellem E, Broekhuijse MLWJ, Chevrier L, Camugli S, Schmitt E, Schibler L, Koenen EPC. Use of combinations of in vitro quality assessments to predict fertility of bovine semen. Theriogenology. 2015;84(9):1447-1454.e5. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.07.035. PMid:26296523.

Strzeżek R, Filipowicz K, Stanczak M, Kordan W. Spectrophotometric analysis of the resazurin reduction test as a tool for assessing canine semen quality. Bull Vet Inst Pulawy. 2013;57(2):281-5. http://doi.org/10.2478/bvip-2013-0049.

Sung K, Park M, Chon J, Khan S. Methods to grow and measure in vitro static biofilms. Encycl Infect Immun. 2022;4:408-29. http://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818731-9.00167-1.

Tanga BM, Qamar AY, Raza S, Bang S, Fang X, Yoon K, Cho J. Semen evaluation: methodological advancements in sperm quality-specific fertility assessment — A review. Anim Biosci. 2021;34(8):1253-70. http://doi.org/10.5713/ab.21.0072. PMid:33902175.

Trzcińska M, Bryła M. A new sperm selection criterion for cryopreservation of boar semen. Ann Anim Sci. 2021;21(2):513-25. http://doi.org/10.2478/aoas-2020-0095.

Tsakmakidis IA, Lymberopoulos AG, Khalifa TAA. Relationship between sperm quality traits and field-fertility of porcine semen. J Vet Sci. 2010;11(2):151-4. http://doi.org/10.4142/jvs.2010.11.2.151. PMid:20458156.

Valverde A, Barquero V, Soler C. The application of computer-assisted semen analysis (CASA) technology to optimise semen evaluation. A review. J Anim Feed Sci. 2020;29(3):189-98. http://doi.org/10.22358/jafs/127691/2020.

Vyt P, Maes D, Dejonckheere E, Castryck F, Van Soom A. Comparative study on five different commercial extenders for boar semen. Reprod Domest Anim. 2004;39(1):8-12. http://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0531.2003.00468.x. PMid:15129914.

Wang RS, Oldham WM, Maron BA, Loscalzo J. Systems biology approaches to redox metabolism in stress and disease states. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2018;29(10):953-72. http://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2017.7256. PMid:29121773.

Wang S, Holyoak GR, Panter KE, Liu G, Liu Y, Evans RC, Bunch TD. Resazurin reduction assay for ram sperm metabolic activity measured by spectrophotometry. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1998;217(2):197-202. http://doi.org/10.3181/00379727-217-44223. PMid:9452144.

Zalata AA, Lammer Tijn N, Christophe A, Comhaire FH. The correlates and alleged biochemical background of the resazurin reduction test in semen. Int J Androl. 1998;21(5):289-94. http://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2605.1998.00126.x. PMid:9805245.

Zrimšek P, Kunc J, Kosec M, Mrkun J. Spectrophotometric application of resazurin reduction assay to evaluate boar semen quality. Int J Androl. 2004;27(1):57-62. http://doi.org/10.1046/j.0105-6263.2003.00448.x. PMid:14718048.

Submitted date:
01/11/2024

Accepted date:
09/27/2024

A simple and rapid evaluation of boar sperm quality using the resazurin colorimetric assay

Fung-Hsiang Chu; Yu-Hsin Chen; Ting-Chieh Kang; Lih-Ren Chen; Hsiu-Lien Herbie Lin

Abstract

Keywords

References

Links

Share

Anim Reprod