Animal Reproduction (AR)
https://animal-reproduction.org/article/doi/10.1590/1984-3143-AR2024-0073
Animal Reproduction (AR)
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Combining two injectable progesterone formulas for estrous synchronization in ewes

Milena Luzorio Simões; Felipe Zandonadi Brandão; Juliana Dantas Rodrigues Santos; Pedro Henrique Nicolau Pinto; Ana Paula Pereira Schmidt; Camila Correa Roza Laeber; Nathália Dutra Knust; Mariana Garcia Kako Rodriguez; Danilo Fila; María Isabel Vázquez; Rodolfo Ungerfeld

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1984-3143-AR2024-0073 Anim Reprod, vol.21, n4, e20240073, 2024
PDF
Downloads: 3
Views: 305

Abstract

The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of combining two injectable progesterone (iP4) formulas for estrous synchronization in ewes and to compare it with traditional intravaginal progesterone devices. Additionally, the study assessed whether the inclusion of GnRH enhances the reproductive outcomes of the iP4 treatment. Two experiments were conducted. In the first experiment, 20 Santa Inês ewes were divided into two groups: one group received intravaginal progesterone devices, and the other received combined long-acting and short-acting iP4. In the second experiment, 30 Corriedale ewes were divided into two groups: one received the combined iP4 with GnRH, and the other without GnRH. Estrous, ovulation, follicular populations, and progesterone concentrations were monitored. The combined iP4 treatment induced an artificial luteal phase and produced reproductive responses similar to those obtained with intravaginal devices. In the first experiment, the iP4 treatment tended to result in more synchronized ovulation compared to the control (P=0.095). In the second experiment, adding GnRH enhanced the quality of the corpus luteum, as indicated by increased diameter and vascularization on Day 23 (P=0.047 and P=0.02, respectively). The combined administration of long-acting and short-acting iP4 effectively synchronized estrous in ewes and showed similar efficacy to traditional intravaginal devices. The inclusion of GnRH improved luteal quality, suggesting potential benefits for reproductive management in ewes. Further studies are needed to evaluate the fertility outcomes of these protocols under field conditions.

Keywords

follicle dynamics, reproductive seasonality, reproductive efficiency, sheep

References

Cosentino IO, Balaro MFA, Menchaca A, Pérez-Clariget R, Ungerfeld R, Brandão FZ. Recent advances in treatments for resynchronization of ovulation in small ruminants: a review. Anim Reprod. 2023;20(1):e20220111. http://doi.org/10.1590/1984-3143-ar-2022-011. PMid:37101425.

D’Avila CA, Moraes FP, Bohn AP, Rovani MT, Vieira AD, Ferreira R, Sales JNS, Baldassarre H, Mondadori RG, Gonçalves PBD, Gasperin BG. Injectable progesterone for estrus and ovulation induction in seasonal anestrous ewes. Livest Sci. 2022;265:105070. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2022.105070.

Driancout MA. Regulation of ovarian follicular dynamics in farm animal. Implication for manipulation of reproduction. Theriogenology. 2001;55(4):1211-39. http://doi.org/10.1016/s0093-691x(01)00479-4.

Gatti M, Ungerfeld R. Intravaginal sponges to synchronize estrus decrease sexual attractiveness in ewes. Theriogenology. 2012;78(8):1796-9. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2012.07.001. PMid:22925645.

Goletiani NV, Keith DR, Gorsky SJ. Progesterone: review of safety for clinical studies. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2007;15(5):427-44. http://doi.org/10.1037/1064-1297.15.5.427. PMid:17924777.

González-Bulnes A, Menchaca A, Martin GB, Martínez-Ros P. Seventy years of progestagen treatments for management of the sheep oestrous cycle: where we are and where we should go. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2020;32(5):441-52. http://doi.org/10.1071/RD18477. PMid:31972122.

Liu SS, Ying GG, Liu YS, Yang YY, He LY, Chen J, Liu WR, Zhao JL. Occurrence, and removal of progestagens in two representative swine farms: effectiveness of lagoon and digester treatment. Water Res. 2015;77:146-54. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.03.022. PMid:25864005.

Manes J, Campero C, Hozbor F, Alberio R, Ungerfeld R. Vaginal histological changes after using intravaginal sponges for oestrus synchronization in anoestrous ewes. Reprod Domest Anim. 2015;50(2):270-4. http://doi.org/10.1111/rda.12482. PMid:25604995.

Manes J, Fiorentino MA, San Martino S, Ungerfeld R. Changes in the vaginal microbiota in ewes after insertion of intravaginal sponges at different stages of the oestrous cycle. Livest Sci. 2018;208:55-9. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2017.11.023.

Manes J, Hozbor F, Alberio R, Ungerfeld R. Intravaginal placebo sponges affect negatively the conception rate in sheep. Small Rumin Res. 2014;120(1):108-11. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2014.05.006.

Manes J, Rios G, Fiorentino MA, Ungerfeld R. Vaginal mucus from ewes treated with progestogen sponges affects quality of ram spermatozoa. Theriogenology. 2016;85(5):856-61. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.10.033. PMid:26627933.

Martin GB, Milton JT, Davidson RH, Banchero Hunzicker GE, Lindsay DR, Blache D. Natural methods for increasing reproductive efficiency in small ruminants. Anim Reprod Sci. 2004;82-83:231-45. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2004.05.014. PMid:15271456.

Pérez-Clariget, R, Pérez, AL, Ungerfeld, R. Treatments with intravaginal sponges for estrous synchronization in ewes: length of the treatment, amount of medroxyprogesterone, and administration of a long-acting progesterone. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2021;53(3):345. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-021-02798-w.

Robinson TJ. The artificial insemination of the Merino sheep following the synchronization of oestrus and ovulation by progesterone injected alone and with Pregnant Mare Serum Gonadotrophin (PMS). Aust J Agric Res. 1956;7(3):194-210. http://doi.org/10.1071/AR9560194.

Salarpoor MV, Kadivar A, Davoodian N, Khosravian P, Esfandabadi NS, Mohevvi A, Mehrban H. Development and evaluation of an injectable slow-release progesterone formulation for estrus synchronization in ewes out of the breeding season. Reprod Domest Anim. 2023;58(7):935-45. http://doi.org/10.1111/rda.14370. PMid:37128978.

Santos JDR, Santos VC, Pinto PHN, Balaro MFA, Ramalho NP, Ungerfeld R, Brandão FZ. Pharmacokinetics of long-acting injectable progesterone in ewes. Anim Sci Proc. 2023;14(3):528. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.anscip.2023.03.157.

Santos VC, Balaro MFA, Ribeiro ACS, Taira AR, Schmidt APP, Pinto PHN, Menchaca A, Ungerfeld R, Brandão FZ. Injectable progesterone, follicular dynamics and estrous synchronization in cyclic ewes. Anim Reprod. 2022 [cited 2022 Nov 1];19(2 spe):e22015. Available from: https://animal-reproduction.org/article/63039fa0a953951e8a588014/pdf/animreprod-19-2-e22015.pdf

Sauer P, Golovko O, Valentová O, Bořík A, Grabic R, Kroupová HK. Two synthetic progestins and natural progesterone are responsible for most of the progestagenic activities in municipal wastewater treatment plant effluents in the Czech and Slovak republics. Water Res. 2018;137:64-71. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.02.065. PMid:29544204.

Souza-Fabjan JMG, Rosa RM, Balaro MFA, Pinto PHN, Santos GB, Arashiro EKN, Fonseca JF, Ungerfeld R, Brandão FZ. Effect of different hormonal combinations on follicular wave emergence and superovulatory response in sheep. Theriogenology. 2017;103:24-9. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.07.036. PMid:28763726.

Suiter J. Body condition scoring of sheep and goats. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: ESGPIP; 1994. Technical Bulletin; 69.

Ungerfeld R, Rubianes E. Estrus response to the ram effect in Corriedale ewes primed with medroxyprogesterone during the breeding season. Small Rumin Res. 2019;32(1):89-91. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4488(98)00164-3.
 

Submitted date:
05/27/2024

Accepted date:
08/16/2024

66ffe57da953956c9d1514d4 animreprod Articles
Links & Downloads
1984-3143 (Electronic) 1806-9614 (Printed)
Anim Reprod ©2024 All rights reserved.

Anim Reprod

Share this page
Page Sections