Comparative evaluation of sperm parameters in Italian (Apis mellifera ligustica) and Africanized (Apis mellifera) honeybee drones from the Caatinga biome

Lilian Leal Dantas; Andréia Maria da Silva; Leandro Alves da Silva; Pedro Augusto Pinheiro Brito; Yuri Gonçalves Matos; Romário Parente Santos; Kátia Peres Gramacho; Alexandre Rodrigues Silva

doi:10.1590/1984-3143-AR2025-0113

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Comparative evaluation of sperm parameters in Italian (Apis mellifera ligustica) and Africanized (Apis mellifera) honeybee drones from the Caatinga biome

Lilian Leal Dantas; Andréia Maria da Silva; Leandro Alves da Silva; Pedro Augusto Pinheiro Brito; Yuri Gonçalves Matos; Romário Parente Santos; Kátia Peres Gramacho; Alexandre Rodrigues Silva

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1984-3143-AR2025-0113 Anim Reprod, vol.23, n2, e20250113, 2026

PDF

Downloads: 0

Abstract

Bees are essential pollinators with species differing morphologically and physiologically. Understanding the variations in reproductive parameters between phenotypes is crucial. This study compares the sperm characteristics of Italian (Apis mellifera ligustica) and Africanized drones (Apis mellifera L.) raised in the Caatinga biome. Nine sexually mature Italian drones and sixteen Africanized drones from different colonies were used. Semen was collected using the endophallus eversion technique and diluted in saline solution (1:20). The parameters analyzed included: motility (optical microscopy), sperm viability (Hoechst 33342; propidium iodide), functional integrity of the plasma membrane (hypo-osmotic test), morphology and morphometry (Rose Bengal), and scanning electron microscopy. The results were expressed as mean ± standard error. Statistical analyses included the Shapiro-Wilk test to the normality of residuals and the Bartlett test to verify homoscedasticity. Comparisons between groups were performed using the Mann-Whitney and Student's t-tests (P < 0.05). Both phenotypes presented 90% sperm motility with viability of 82.4 ± 2.5% for Italians and 81.1 ± 2.4% for Africanized ones; the functional integrity of the plasma membrane was 93.4 ± 1.8% and 91.6 ± 1.5%, respectively. Regarding morphology, the percentage of normal sperm was 10.89 ± 1.66% for Italian and 12.06 ± 1.01% for Africanized, with the curled tail being the most predominant feature of sperm morphology. No statistically significant differences (P > 0.05) were observed for the above-mentioned parameters. Sperm head morphometry was significantly larger (P < 0.05) in Italian (10.04 ± 0.03 µm) compared to Africanized (9.33 ± 0.04 µm). Scanning electron microscopy analysis revealed no ultrastructural differences between phenotypes. In conclusion, there is a high degree of similarity in sperm parameters of both phenotypes under the same environmental conditions, indicating the feasibility of applying similar reproductive strategies.

Keywords

beekeeping, biobank, conservation, polinators

References

Abu DAH, Franken DR, Hoffman B, Henkel R. Accurate sperm morphology assessment predicts sperm function. Andrologia. 2012;44(Suppl 1):571-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0272.2011.01229.x. PMid:22040054.

Aguiar SF, Joventino APR, Lima GAM, Sousa IS, Teixeira LL, Toniolli R. Fisiologia do movimento espermático. Ciência Animal [serial on the Internet], 2024 [cited 2025 July 29];34(4):73–93. Available from: https://revistas.uece.br/index.php/cienciaanimal/article/view/14728

Ayeneshet B, Taye M, Esatu W, Tsefa A. Comparative analysis of semen quality and fertility in diverse rooster breeds: a systematic review. Worlds Poult Sci J. 2024;80(3):947-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/00439339.2024.2338347.

Bird G, Wilson AE, Williams GR, Hardy NB. Parasites and pesticides act antagonistically on honeybee health. J Appl Ecol. 2021;58(5):997-1005. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13811.

Bratu IC, Igna V, Simiz E, Dunea IB, Patruica S. The influence of body weight on semen parameters in Apis mellifera drones. Insects. 2022;13(12):1141. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13121141. PMid:36555051.

Cobey SW, Tarpy DR, Woyke J. Standard methods for instrumental insemination of Apis mellifera queens. J Apic Res. 2013;52(4):1-18. https://doi.org/10.3896/IBRA.1.52.4.09.

Collins AM, Donoghue AM. Viability assessment of honeybee, Apis mellifera, sperm using dual fluorescent staining. Theriogenology. 1999;51(8):1513-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(99)00094-1. PMid:10729078.

Collins AM. Insemination of honeybee, Apis mellifera, queens with non-frozen stored semen: sperm concentration measured with a spectrophotometer. J Apic Res. 2005;44(4):141-5. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.2005.11101168.

Degueldre F, Aron S. Long‐term sperm storage in eusocial Hymenoptera. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2023;98(2):567-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12919. PMid:36397639.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations – FAO. Why bees matter [online]. Slovenia: FAO; 2018 [cited 2025 July 29]. Available from: https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/0f47dba8-ab04-4968-a2bc-8a9c06218653/content

Gontarz A, Banaszewska D, Gryzinska M, Andraszek K. Differences in drone sperm morphometry and activity at the beginning and end of the season. Turk J Vet Anim Sci. 2016;40(5):598-602. https://doi.org/10.3906/vet-1511-6.

Güler A, Önder H, Kavak G, Toktay G, Uğurlutepe E, Biyik S, Aydin A. The effects of instrumental insemination on selected and unselected breeding characteristics in honeybee (Apis mellifera L.). Apidologie (Celle). 2022;53(4):35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-022-00947-0.

Hemberger J, Crossley MS, Gratton C. Historical decrease in agricultural landscape diversity is associated with shifts in bumble bee species occurrence. Ecol Lett. 2021;24(9):1800-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13786. PMid:34143928.

Hopkins BK, Herr C. Factors affecting the successful cryopreservation of honeybee (Apis mellifera) spermatozoa. Apidologie. 2010;41(5):548-56. https://doi.org/10.1051/apido/20010006.

Kahya Y, Gençer HV. Reproductive quality in drones bred from Caucasian (A. m. caucasica) and Italian (A. m. ligustica) honeybee colonies. Apidologie. 2023;54(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-022-00973-y.

Khan KA, Rafique MK, Lashari MA, Iqbal A, Mahmood R, Ahmed AM, Khoso FN, Ahmad S, AL-Shehri BM, Mohammed MEA, Ghramh HA. Instrumental insemination: a nontraditional technique to produce superior quality honeybee (Apis mellifera) queens. J King Saud Univ Sci. 2022;34(5):102077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2022.102077.

Kline O, Joshi NK. Mitigating the effects of habitat loss on solitary bees in agricultural ecosystems. Agriculture. 2020;10(4):115. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10040115.

Larson-Cook KL, Brannian JD, Hansen KA, Kasperson KM, Aamold ET, Evenson DP. Relationship between the outcomes of assisted reproductive techniques and sperm DNA fragmentation as measured by the sperm chromatin structure assay. Fertil Steril. 2003;80(4):895-902. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(03)01116-6. PMid:14556809.

Lino-Neto J, Báo SN, Dolder H. Sperm ultrastructure of the honeybee (Apis mellifera)(L) (Hymenoptera, Apidae) with emphasis on the nucleus-flagellum transition region. Tissue Cell. 2000;32(4):322-7. https://doi.org/10.1054/tice.2000.0119. PMid:11145015.

Mendes AMC. Inseminação artificial em abelhas rainhas. Agroforum [serial on the Internet]. 2008 [cited 2025 July 29];16:31-36. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.11/5977

Morais LS, Araújo ER No, Silva AM, Marinho DEL, Bezerra LGP, Velarde JMDS, Silva AR, Gramacho KP, Message D. Sperm characteristics of Africanized honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) drones during dry and wet seasons in the Caatinga biome. J Apic Res. 2022;63(5):1106-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.2022.2113328.

Murray JF, van der Horst G, Allsopp M, Kotzé RCM. A new fluorescent method to determine honeybee sperm motility parameters with computer-aided sperm analysis. J Apic Res. 2023;62(4):944-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.2022.2090729.

Nur Z, Dogan I, Yerlikaya H, Soylu MK. Relationship between the canine sperm membrane integrity and other semen characteristics. Indian Vet J. 2004;81(10):1119-21.

Nur Z, Seven-Cakmak S, Ustuner B, Cakmak I, Erturk M, Abramson CI, Sagirkaya H, Soylu MK. The use of the hypo-osmotic swelling test, water test, and supravital staining in the evaluation of drone sperm. Apidologie (Celle). 2012;43(1):31-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-011-0073-1.

Page ML, Williams NM. Honeybee introductions displace native bees and decrease pollination of a native wildflower. Ecology. 2023;104(2):e3939. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.3939. PMid:36457280.

Peng CYS, Yin CM, Yin LRS. Effect of rapid freezing and thawing on cellular integrity of honeybee sperm. Physiol Entomol. 1992;17(3):269-76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3032.1992.tb01021.x.

Peng CYS, Yin CM, Yin LRS. Ultrastructure of honeybee, Apis mellifera, sperm with special emphasis on the acrosomal complex following high-pressure freezing fixation. Physiol Entomol. 1993;18(1):93-101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3032.1993.tb00454.x.

Pettis JS, Rice N, Joselow K, vanEngelsdorp D, Chaimanee V. Colony failure linked to low sperm viability in honeybee (Apis mellifera) queens and an exploration of potential causative factors. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0147220. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147220. PMid:26863438.

Power K, D’Anza E, Martano M, Albarella S, Ciotola F, Peretti V, Maiolino P. Morphological and morphometric analysis of the Italian honeybee (Apis mellifera ligustica) spermatozoa: a preliminary study in Campania region. Nucleus. 2019;4(1):61. https://doi.org/10.7243/2054-3425-6-2.

Rangel J, Fisher A. Factors affecting the reproductive health of honeybee (Apis mellifera) drones: a review. Apidologie (Celle). 2019;2019(50):759-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-019-00684-x.

Rankin D, Kokko H. Do males matter? The role of males in population dynamics. Oikos. 2007;116(2):335-48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2007.15451.x.

Rathke C, Baarends WM, Awe S, Renkawitz-Pohl R. Dinâmica da cromatina durante a espermiogênese. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1839(3):155-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagrm.2013.08.004. PMid:24091090.

Santos MVO, Silva HVR, Bezerra LGP, Oliveira LRM, Oliveira MF, Alves ND, Silva LDM, Silva AR, Pereira AF. Heterologous in vitro fertilization and embryo production for assessment of jaguar (Panthera onca Linnaeus, 1758) frozen-thawed semen in different extenders. Anim Reprod. 2022;19(1):e20210093. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-3143-ar2021-0093. PMid:35371300.

Saravia F, Núñez-Martínez I, Morán JM, Soler C, Muriel A, Rodríguez-Martínez H, Peña FJ. Differences in boar sperm head shape and dimensions recorded by computer-assisted sperm morphometry are not related to chromatin integrity. Theriogenology. 2007;68(2):196-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.04.052. PMid:17555808.

Slater GP. How does genetic variation influence honeybee (apis mellifera) drone fertility traits? [thesis]. West Lafayette: Purdue University Graduate School; 2022. https://doi.org/10.25394/PGS.20387460.v1.

Soroye P, Newbold T, Kerr J. Climate change contributes to widespread declines among bumble bees across continents. Science. 2020;367(6478):685-8. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax8591. PMid:32029628.

Taha EKA, Alqarni AS. Morphometric and reproductive organs characters of Apis mellifera jemenitica drones in comparison to Apis mellifera carnica. Int J Sci Eng Res [serial on the Internet]. 2013 [cited 2025 July 29];4(10):411-5. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259493247_Morphometric_and_Reproductive_Organs_Characters_of_Apis_mellifera_jemenitica_Drones_in_Comparison_to_Apis_mellifera_carnica

Tarliyah L, Boediono A, Pergerakan D. Spermatozoa leb ah madu Apis mellifera L.(hymenoptera: Apidae) pada berbagai suhu penyimpanan dalam media pengencer dengan kadar glukosa yang berbeda. Media Veteriner [serial on the Internet]. 1999 [cited 2025 July 29];6:15-20. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/AriefBoediono/publication/277773040_Motility_of_Honeybee_Apis_Mellifera_L_Hymenoptera_Apidae_Spermatozoa_in_Various_Storage_Temperature_in_Dilution_Media_Containing_Different_Glucose_Levels/links/5c8793e4a6fdcc88c39c343f/Motility-of-Honeybee-Apis-Mellifera-L-Hymenoptera-Apidae-Spermatozoa-in-Various-Storage-Temperature-in-Dilution-Media-Containing-Different-Glucose-Levels.pdf

Tofilski A, Chuda-Mickiewicz B, Czekońska K. Circular movement of honeybee spermatozoa inside spermatheca. Invertebr Reprod Dev. 2018;62(2):63-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/07924259.2018.1445042.

Vagnarelli P. Chromatin reorganization through mitosis. Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol. 2013;90:179-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-410523-2.00006-7. PMid:23582205.

Wysokińska A, Szablicka D. Integrity of sperm cell membrane in the semen of crossbred and purebred boars during storage at 17 C: heterosis effects. Animals. 2021;11(12):3373. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11123373. PMid:34944150.

Yániz JL, Palacín O, Vicente-Fiel S, Gosalvez J, López-Fernández G, Santolaria P. Comparison of membrane‐permeant fluorescent probes for sperm viability assessment in the ram. Reprod Domest Anim. 2013;48(4):598-603. https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.12132. PMid:23293961.

Yániz JL, Silvestre MA, Santolaria P. Sperm quality assessment in honeybee drones. Biology. 2020;9(7):174. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology9070174. PMid:32708362.

Zhao H, Mashilingi SK, Liu Y, An J. factors influencing the reproductive ability of male bees: current knowledge and further directions. Insects. 2021;12(6):529. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12060529. PMid:34200253.

Submitted date:
07/29/2025

Accepted date:
01/14/2026

Comparative evaluation of sperm parameters in Italian (Apis mellifera ligustica) and Africanized (Apis mellifera) honeybee drones from the Caatinga biome

Lilian Leal Dantas; Andréia Maria da Silva; Leandro Alves da Silva; Pedro Augusto Pinheiro Brito; Yuri Gonçalves Matos; Romário Parente Santos; Kátia Peres Gramacho; Alexandre Rodrigues Silva

Abstract

Keywords

References

Links

Share

Anim Reprod