Calving outcomes after ipsilateral versus contralateral supplementary embryo transfer in repeat-breeder Holstein cows

Chihiro Kanno; Takahiro Gyoda

doi:10.1590/1984-3143-AR2026-0007

SHORT COMMUNICATION

Calving outcomes after ipsilateral versus contralateral supplementary embryo transfer in repeat-breeder Holstein cows

Chihiro Kanno; Takahiro Gyoda

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1984-3143-AR2026-0007 Anim Reprod, vol.23, n3, e20260007, 2026

PDF

Downloads: 0

Abstract

Supplementary embryo transfer (ET) following artificial insemination (AI) is used in repeat-breeder cows; however, this dual-embryo approach inherently increases the risk of twin outcomes. This study evaluated whether transferring an embryo to the uterine horn contralateral to the corpus luteum (CL) could be associated with different calving outcomes from ipsilateral transfer. Holstein cows (n = 187; 79 nulliparous and 108 multiparous) received ipsilateral or contralateral ET 7–8 days after AI using frozen–thawed, in vitro-produced embryos. Repeat-breeder cows were clinically defined as cows failing to conceive after ≥3 artificial inseminations without evident reproductive abnormalities on routine examination. Data were analyzed using a generalized linear mixed model accounting for parity and technician. The calving rate was 34.8% (32/92) in the contralateral group and 46.3% (44/95) in the ipsilateral group, with no significant difference between groups (aOR = 0.62, 95% CI 0.33–1.15; P = 0.137). Twin calving incidence was numerically lower after contralateral ET (4.8%, 1/21) compared with ipsilateral ET (21.2%, 7/33; P = 0.131). Because this study was based on calving records and involved a limited number of animals, the findings should be interpreted cautiously. Contralateral supplementary ET may represent a practical option for further investigation.

Keywords

artificial insemination, calving rate, repeat breeder, supplementary embryo transfer, twin calving

References

Baez GM, Trevisol E, Barletta RV, Cardoso BO, Ricci A, Guenther JN, Cummings NE, Wiltbank MC. Proposal of a new model for CL regression or maintenance during pregnancy on the basis of timing of regression of contralateral, accessory CL in pregnant cows. Theriogenology. 2017;89:214-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.09.055. PMid:28043355.

Bagés-Arnal S, Sánchez JM, Fernandez-Fuertes B, Lonergan P, Gutierrez-Adán A, Fair T. Location relative to the corpus luteum affects bovine endometrial response to a conceptus. Reproduction. 2020;159(5):643-57. https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-19-0464. PMid:32168470.

Berry DP. Invited review: Beef-on-dairy—The generation of crossbred beef × dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 2021;104(4):3789-819. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-19519. PMid:33663845.

Carbonari A, Burgio M, Frattina L, Cicirelli V, Rizzo A. Repeat breeder syndrome therapies in dairy cows: a review. Reprod Domest Anim. 2024;59(10):e14732. https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.14732. PMid:39392176.

Christie WB, Newcomb R, Rowson LEA. Embryo survival after transfer of an egg to the uterine horn contralateral to the corpus luteum and the effect of treatments with progesterone or hCG on pregnancy rates. J Reprod Fertil. 1979;56(2):701-6. https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0560701. PMid:480322.

Del Campo MR, Rowe RF, Chaichareon D, Ginther OJ. Effect of the relative locations of embryo and corpus luteum on embryo survival in cattle. Reprod Nutr Dev. 1983;23(2a):303-8. https://doi.org/10.1051/rnd:19830214. PMid:6844722.

Dochi O, Takahashi K, Hirai T, Hayakawa H, Tanisawa M, Yamamoto Y, Koyama H. The use of embryo transfer to produce pregnancies in repeat-breeding dairy cattle. Theriogenology. 2008;69(1):124-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.09.001. PMid:17942148.

Monteiro PLJ, Gamarra CA, Genari RS, Prata AB, Barletta RV, Duran PG, Canavessi AMO, Sartori R, Wiltbank MC. Accessory corpus luteum regression during pregnancy II: reproductive outcomes. Reproduction. 2021b;162(6):483-95. https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-21-0168. PMid:34780347.

Monteiro PLJ, Sartori R, Canavessi AMO, Melo LF, Motta JCL, Consentini CEC, Wiltbank MC. Accessory corpus luteum regression during pregnancy I: timing, physiology, and P4 profiles. Reproduction. 2021a;162(6):473-82. https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-21-0167. PMid:34597273.

Tervit HR, Havik PG, Smith JF. Egg transfer in cattle: pregnancy rate following transfer to the uterine horn ipsilateral or contralateral to the functional corpus luteum. Theriogenology. 1977;7(1):3-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691x(77)90262-x. PMid:873033.

Moore SG, Hasler JF. A 100-year review: reproductive technologies in dairy science. J Dairy Sci. 2017;100(12):10314-31. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13138. PMid:29153167.

Sánchez JM, Passaro C, Forde N, Browne JA, Behura SK, Fernández-Fuertes B, Mathew DJ, Kelly AK, Butler ST, Spencer TE, Lonergan P. Differences in endometrial transcriptome between uterine horns ipsilateral and contralateral to corpus luteum: impact on conceptus growth to day 14 in cattle. Biol Reprod. 2019;100(1):86-100. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolre/ioy185. PMid:30137215.

Yaginuma H, Funeshima N, Tanikawa N, Miyamura M, Tsuchiya H, Noguchi T, Iwata H, Kuwayama T, Shirasuna K, Hamano S. Improvement of fertility in repeat breeder dairy cattle by embryo transfer following artificial insemination: possibility of interferon tau replenishment effect. J Reprod Dev. 2019;65(3):223-9. https://doi.org/10.1262/jrd.2018-121. PMid:30745523.

Submitted date:
01/14/2026

Accepted date:
05/29/2026

Calving outcomes after ipsilateral versus contralateral supplementary embryo transfer in repeat-breeder Holstein cows

Chihiro Kanno; Takahiro Gyoda

Abstract

Keywords

References

Links

Share

Anim Reprod