Bridging the gap between basic research and commercial application at scale for in vitro bovine embryo production

Rebecca L. Krisher

doi:10.1590/1984-3143-AR2026-0080

Thematic Section: 39th Annual Meeting of the Brazilian Embryo Technology Society (SBTE)

Bridging the gap between basic research and commercial application at scale for in vitro bovine embryo production

Rebecca L. Krisher

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1984-3143-AR2026-0080 Anim Reprod, vol.23, n4, e20260080, 2026

PDF

Downloads: 0

Abstract

The rapid expansion of in vitro embryo production (IVP) in cattle has established this technology as a major driver of genetic progress and production efficiency. Despite widespread adoption, IVP systems remain inherently inefficient, with substantial losses occurring from oocyte to blastocyst and variable outcomes following transfer. At the same time, significant advances in the understanding of oocyte competence and embryo biology have occurred. However, this knowledge has not consistently translated into improvements in commercial embryo production. The purpose of this review is to examine the gap between basic discovery and field application in bovine IVP and to define the biological and operational factors that limit successful translation at scale. A central constraint is the fundamental difference between systems optimized under controlled laboratory conditions and those required to perform consistently across diverse donor populations, laboratory environments, and high-throughput workflows. Biological variability, metabolic regulation, and the complexity of embryo physiology intersect with operational feasibility, including scalability, cost, and workforce constraints, to limit adoption of new approaches. A structured translational pipeline, from discovery through proof of concept, development, and implementation, is required to align mechanistic insight with commercial realities. Successful translation depends on integrating biological understanding with system robustness, evaluating outcomes beyond early developmental endpoints, and aligning research and industry priorities throughout the development process. Strengthening the collaboration between research and industry is essential for continued innovation and growth of bovine IVP systems.

Keywords

in vitro fertilization, embryo transfer, translational pipeline

References

Amaral TF, de Grazia JGV, Martinhao LAG, De Col F, Siqueira LGB, Viana JHM, Hansen PJ. Actions of CSF2 and DKK1 on bovine embryo development and pregnancy outcomes are affected by composition of embryo culture medium. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):7503. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11447-7. PMid:35525843.

Anderson JM. Bovine superovulation and embryo transfer – how to make babies! American Association of Bovine Practitioners Proc. 2023;56(2):115-7.

Crowe AD, Doyle RC, Lonergan P, Butler ST. Gestation length, calf birth weight, calving difficulty, perinatal mortality, and calf health following timed artificial insemination or embryo transfer with fresh or frozen in vitro-produced embryos. J Dairy Sci. 2025;108(11):12759-73. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2025-26958. PMid:40885305.

Currin L, Michalovic L, Bellefleur AM, Gutierrez K, Glanzner W, Schuermann Y, Bohrer RC, Dicks N, da Rosa PR, De Cesaro MP, Lopez R, Grand FX, Vigneault C, Blondin P, Gourdon J, Baldassarre H, Bordignon V. The effect of age and length of gonadotropin stimulation on the in vitro embryo development of Holstein calf oocytes. Theriogenology. 2017;104:87-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.08.011. PMid:28822904.

Demetrio D, Demetrio C, Oliveira M, Reis R, Santos R. From oocyte to calf: practical aspects of bovine in vitro embryo production. Clin Ther. 2022;14(3):193-201. https://doi.org/10.58292/ct.v14.9671.

Demetrio DGB, Benedetti E, Demetrio CGB, Fonseca J, Oliveira M, Magalhaes A, Dos Santos RM. How can we improve embryo production and pregnancy outcomes of Holstein embryos producedin vitro? (12 years of practical results at a California dairy farm). Anim Reprod. 2020;17(3):e20200053. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-3143-ar2020-0053. PMid:33029219.

Driver AM, Peñagaricano F, Huang W, Ahmad KR, Hackbart KS, Wiltbank MC, Khatib H. RNA-Seq analysis uncovers transcriptomic variations between morphologically similar in vivo- and in vitro-derived bovine blastocysts. BMC Genomics. 2012;13(1):118. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-13-118. PMid:22452724.

Fair T, Lonergan P. The oocyte: the key player in the success of assisted reproduction technologies. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2023;36(2):133-48. https://doi.org/10.1071/RD23164. PMid:38064189.

Ferré LB, Kjelland ME, Strøbech LB, Hyttel P, Mermillod P, Ross PJ. Recent advances in bovine in vitro embryo production: reproductive biotechnology history and methods. Animal. 2020;14(5):991-1004. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731119002775. PMid:31760966.

Funnell B, Briand-Amirat L, Viana JHM, Perry G. Disease risk of in vitro produced embryos: a review of current commercial practices in the context of international trade with emphasis on bovine embryos. Theriogenology. 2024;230:212-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2024.09.019. PMid:39332381.

Gebremedhn S, Rubessa M, Lockhart K, Natera E, Krisher RL, Rodriguez-Villamil P. Supplementation of organelle-specific antioxidants during in vitro oocyte maturation enhances embryo development and pregnancy outcomes in bovine. Theriogenology. 2026;258:117889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2026.117889. PMid:41818856.

Hansen PJ, Block J, Loureiro B, Bonilla L, Hendricks KE. Effects of gamete source and culture conditions on the competence of in vitro-produced embryos for post-transfer survival in cattle. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2010;22(1):59-66. https://doi.org/10.1071/RD09212. PMid:20003846.

Hansen PJ. Pressing needs and recent advances to enhance production of embryos in vitro in cattle. Anim Reprod. 2024;21(3):e20240036. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-3143-ar2024-0036. PMid:39286365.

Hansen PJ. Some challenges and unrealized opportunities toward widespread use of the in vitro-produced embryo in cattle production. Animal. 2023;17(Suppl 1):100745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2023.100745. PMid:37567654.

Herrick JR, Lyons SM, Greene AF, Broeckling CD, Schoolcraft WB, Krisher RL. Direct and Osmolarity-Dependent Effects of Glycine on Preimplantation Bovine Embryos. PLoS One. 2016;11(7):e0159581. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159581. PMid:27459477.

Herrick JR, Rajput S, Pasquariello R, Ermisch A, Santiquet N, Schoolcraft WB, Krisher RL. Developmental and molecular response of bovine embryos to reduced nutrients in vitro. Reprod Fertil. 2020;1(1):51-65. https://doi.org/10.1530/RAF-20-0033. PMid:35128423.

Hughes JP, Rees S, Kalindjian SB, Philpott KL. Principles of early drug discovery. Br J Pharmacol. 2011;162(6):1239-49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.01127.x. PMid:21091654.

Krisher RL, Herrick JR. Bovine embryo production in vitro: evolution of culture media and commercial perspectives. Anim Reprod. 2024;21(3):e20240051. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-3143-ar2024-0051. PMid:39372256.

Krisher RL, Heuberger AL, Paczkowski M, Stevens J, Pospisil C, Prather RS, Sturmey RG, Herrick JR, Schoolcraft WB. Applying metabolomic analyses to the practice of embryology: physiology, development and assisted reproductive technology. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2015;27(4):602-20. https://doi.org/10.1071/RD14359. PMid:25763765.

Krisher RL, Prather RS. A role for the Warburg effect in preimplantation embryo development: metabolic modification to support rapid cell proliferation. Mol Reprod Dev. 2012;79(5):311-20. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.22037. PMid:22431437.

Kulus J, Kulus M, Krajnik K, Chwarzyński M, Jaśkowski JM, Mozdziak P, Kempisty B, Antosik P. Minimally invasive laparoscopic ovum pick-up (LOPU) in hormonally stimulated Holstein calves. BMC Vet Res. 2026. Ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-026-05634-1. PMid:42304450.

Leese HJ, Baumann CG, Brison DR, McEvoy TG, Sturmey RG. Metabolism of the viable mammalian embryo: quietness revisited. Mol Hum Reprod. 2008;14(12):667-72. https://doi.org/10.1093/molehr/gan065. PMid:19019836.

Leese HJ, Brison DR, Sturmey RG. The quiet embryo hypothesis: 20 years on. Front Physiol. 2022;13:899485. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.899485. PMid:35634152.

Lonergan P, Fair T. The ART of studying early embryo development: progress and challenges in ruminant embryo culture. Theriogenology. 2014;81(1):49-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2013.09.021. PMid:24274409.

Lonergan P. Embryo transfer: past, present, future – a personal perspective. Anim Reprod. 2024;21(3):e20240068. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-3143-ar2024-0068. PMid:39175992.

Merton JS, Knijn HM, Flapper H, Dotinga F, Roelen BA, Vos PL, Mullaart E. Cysteamine supplementation during in vitro maturation of slaughterhouse- and opu-derived bovine oocytes improves embryonic development without affecting cryotolerance, pregnancy rate, and calf characteristics. Theriogenology. 2013;80(4):365-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2013.04.025. PMid:23746876.

Ming H, Zhang M, Rajput S, Logsdon D, Zhu L, Schoolcraft WB, Krisher RL, Jiang Z, Yuan Y. In vitro culture alters cell lineage composition and cellular metabolism of bovine blastocyst. Biol Reprod. 2024;111(1):11-27. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolre/ioae031. PMid:38408205.

Moura R, Fernandes CA, Siqueira LG, Figueiredo RA, Martins CF, Peixer MA, Xavier MC, Viana JH. Ovarian stimulation of Nelore calves and prepubertal heifers with a long-acting recombinant human FSH (corifollitropin-alpha) and subsequent ovum pick-up and in vitro embryo production outcomes. Theriogenology. 2025;234:110-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2024.12.011. PMid:39681039.

Paczkowski M, Schoolcraft WB, Krisher RL. Fatty acid metabolism during maturation affects glucose uptake and is essential to oocyte competence. Reproduction. 2014;148(4):429-39. https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-14-0015. PMid:25062802.

Pasquariello R, Zhang M, Herrick JR, Ermisch AF, Becker J, Schoolcraft WB, Barfield JP, Yuan Y, Krisher RL. Lipid-enriched reduced nutrient culture medium improves bovine blastocyst formation. Reprod Fertil. 2023;4(4):e230057. https://doi.org/10.1530/RAF-23-0057. PMid:37971749.

Putman B, Rotz CA, Thoma G. A comprehensive environmental assessment of beef production and consumption in the United States. J Clean Prod. 2023;402:136766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136766.

Santos ÉC, Fonseca AM Jr, Lima CB, Ispada J, Silva JVA, Milazzotto MP. Less is more: reduced nutrient concentration during in vitro culture improves embryo production rates and morphophysiology of bovine embryos. Theriogenology. 2021;173:37-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2021.07.010.

Sosa F, Ortega MS. Selecting sires to improve reproductive success: key traits for enhanced fertility and embryo development. Anim Reprod. 2025;22(3):e20250052. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-3143-ar2025-0052. PMid:40933867.

Sutton-McDowall ML, Feil D, Robker RL, Thompson JG, Dunning KR. Utilization of endogenous fatty acid stores for energy production in bovine preimplantation embryos. Theriogenology. 2012;77(8):1632-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.12.008.

Thoma GJ, Baker B, Knap PW. A life cycle assessment study of the impacts of pig breeding on the environmental sustainability of pig production. Animals (Basel). 2024;14(16):2435. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14162435. PMid:39199968.

Viana JHM. 2024 statistics of embryo production and transfer in domestic farm animals. IETS Data retrieval committee report. Embryo Technology Newsletter. 2025;43(4):1-15.

Viana JHM. Development of the world farm animal embryo industry over the past 30 years. Theriogenology. 2024;230:151-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2024.09.012.

Zander-Fox DL, Pacella-Ince L, Morgan DK, Green MP. Mammalian embryo culture media: now and into the future. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2023;36(2):66-80. https://doi.org/10.1071/RD23168. PMid:38064187.

Zolini AM, Carrascal-Triana E, Ruiz de King A, Hansen PJ, Alves Torres CA, Block J. Effect of addition of l-carnitine to media for oocyte maturation and embryo culture on development and cryotolerance of bovine embryos produced in vitro. Theriogenology. 2019;133:135-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2019.05.005. PMid:31091484.

Submitted date:
04/19/2026

Accepted date:
08/05/2026

Bridging the gap between basic research and commercial application at scale for in vitro bovine embryo production

Rebecca L. Krisher

Abstract

Keywords

References

Links

Share

Anim Reprod