Animal Reproduction (AR)
https://animal-reproduction.org/article/doi/10.21451/1984-3143-AR2019-0006
Animal Reproduction (AR)
Original Article

Relationship between fetal biometric assessment by ultrasonography and neonatal lamb vitality, birth weight and growth

Camila Infantosi Vannucchi; Gisele Almeida Lima Veiga; Liege Cristina Garcia Silva; Cristina Fátima Lúcio

Downloads: 0
Views: 3

Abstract

Abstract: Ultrasonographic examination of pregnant ewes can enable the identification of perinatal abnormalities and establish prenatal assistance responsible for minimizing morbidity and perinatal mortality. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a fetal biometric analysis by ultrasonography to predict neonatal vitality and lamb growth during the first month of life. A longitudinal study was conducted with 13 healthy ewes, subjected to ultrasonographic examination every 15 days from 60th day of pregnancy until lambing, evaluating thoracic diameter, abdominal diameter, biparietal diameter, humerus, femur and placentome length. At birth, 22 lambs were assessed through Apgar score at 5 minutes and after 1 hour. Measurement of body weight was also carried out immediately at birth and weekly during 30 days after birth. Thoracic diameter showed a significant increase between 91-105 days and 121-135 days. Conversely, abdominal diameter had a progressive growth until 106-120 days, and then, a steady development was observed. Biparietal diameter showed progressive growth only towards days 91 and 105. For the humerus length, we verified a significant increase between 106-120 days and 121-135 days, remaining unaltered onwards; while femur length continued to grow until lambing. The linear regression analysis between birth weight and biparietal diameter at 60-75 days was high (R2=0.96; P<0.0001; coefficient of variability of 3.3%). In conclusion, ultrasonographic analysis of fetal biparietal diameter at mid-pregnancy can be used as a predictor of lamb weight at birth. Moreover, assessment of femur length at final pregnancy can be employed for fetal and neonatal development estimation.

Keywords

biparietal diameter, fetal ultrasonography, neonatal vitality, ovine

References

Alexander G. Birth weight of lambs: influences and consequences. In: Elliot K, Knight J, editors. Size at birth. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1974. p. 215-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470720097.ch11.

Barbera A, Jones OW 3rd, Zerbe GO, Hobbins JC, Battaglia FC, Meschia G. Ultrasonographic assessment of fetal growth: comparison between human and ovine fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;173(6):1765-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(95)90424-7. PMid:8610759.

Buckrell BC. Applications of ultrasonography in reproduction in sheep and goats. Theriogenology. 1988;29(1):71-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(88)90032-5.

Carr DJ, Aitken RP, Milne JS, David AL, Wallace JM. Ultrasonographic assessment of growth and estimation of birthweight in late gestation fetal sheep. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2011;37(10):1588-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2011.06.016. PMid:21821347.

Doizé F, Vaillancourt D, Carabin H, Belanger D. Determination of gestational age in sheep and goats using transrectal ultrasonographic measurement of placentomes. Theriogenology. 1997;48(3):449-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(97)00254-9. PMid:16728141.

Dwyer CM, Calvert SK, Farish M, Donbavand J, Pickup HE. Breed, litter and parity effects on placental weight and placentome number, and consequences for the neonatal behaviour of the lamb. Theriogenology. 2005;63(4):1092-110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.06.003. PMid:15710196.

Fridlund C, Humblot P, Båge R, Söderquist L. Factors affecting the accuracy of pregnancy scanning in ewes. Vet Rec. 2013;173(24):607. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.101935. PMid:24162506.

Fthenakis GC, Arsenos G, Brozos C, Fragkou IA, Giadinis ND, Giannenas I, Mavrogianni VS, Papadopoulos E, Valasi I. Health management of ewes during pregnancy. Anim Reprod Sci. 2012;130(3-4):198-212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2012.01.016. PMid:22356932.

Gardner DS, Buttery PJ, Daniel Z, Symonds ME. Factors affecting birth weight in sheep: maternal environment. Reproduction. 2007;133(1):297-307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/REP-06-0042. PMid:17244755.

Gonzáles de Bulnes A, Santiago Moreno J, López Sebastián A. Estimation of fetal development in Manchega dairy ewes by transrectal ultrasonographic measurements. Small Rumin Res. 1998;27(3):243-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4488(97)00062-X.

Greenwood PL, Slepetis RM, McPhee MJ, Bell AW. Prediction of stage of pregnancy in prolific sheep using ultrasound measurement of fetal bones. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2002;14(1-2):7-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/RD01047. PMid:12051526.

Haibel GK, Perkins NR. Real-time ultrasonic biparietal diameter of second trimester Suffolk and Finn sheep fetuses and prediction of gestational age. Theriogenology. 1989;32(5):863-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(89)90474-3. PMid:16726732.

Haibel GK. Real-time ultrasonic fetal head measurement and gestational age in dairy goats. Theriogenology. 1988;30(6):1053-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(88)90279-8. PMid:17087893.

Honarvar M, Allahyari M, Dehbashi S. Assessment of fetal weight based on ultrasonic femur length after the second trimester. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2001;73(1):15-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7292(00)00368-4. PMid:11336716.

Jainudeen MR, Hafez ESSE. Ovinos e caprinos. In: Hafez ESSE, Hafez B, editors. Reprodução animal. São Paulo, Brazil: Manole; 2004. p. 335-347.

Jones AK, Reed SA. Benefits of ultrasound scanning during gestation in the small ruminant. Small Rumin Res. 2017;149:163-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2017.02.008.

Kelly RW, Newnham JP, Johnson T, Speijers EJ. An ultrasound technique to measure placental growth in ewes. Aust J Agric Res. 1987;38(4):757-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/AR9870757.

Lekatz LA, Luther JS, Caton JS, Vonnahme KA. Impacts of maternal nutritional plane on umbilical artery hemodynamics, fetal and placentome growth in sheep. Anim Reprod. 2013;10:99-105.

Manning FA. Fetal biophysical profile. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1999;26(4):557-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-8545(05)70099-1. PMid:10587955.

Osgerby JC, Wathes DC, Howard D, Gadd TS. The effect of maternal undernutrition on ovine fetal growth. J Endocrinol. 2002;173(1):131-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1677/joe.0.1730131. PMid:11927392.

Rurak D, Wittman B. Real-time ultrasound assessment of body and breathing movements and abdominal diameter in fetal lambs from 55 days of gestation to term. Reprod Sci. 2013;20(4):414-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1933719112459229. PMid:23171680.

Santiago-Moreno J, Gonzalez-Bulnes A, Gomez-Brunet A, Toledano-Diaz A, Lopez-Sebastian A. Prediction of gestational age by transrectal ultrasonographic measurements in the mouflon (Ovis gmelini musimon). J Zoo Wildl Med. 2005;36(3):457-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1638/04-107.1. PMid:17312765.

Sergeev L, Kleemann DO, Walker SK, Smith DH, Grosser TI, Mann T, Seamark RF. Real-time ultrasound imaging for predicting ovine fetal age. Theriogenology. 1990;34(3):593-601. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(90)90014-K. PMid:16726863.

Schrick FN, Inskeep EK. Determination of early pregnancy in ewes utilizing transrectal ultrasonography. Theriogenology. 1993;40(2):295-306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(93)90267-9. PMid:16727315.

Scott PR, Gessert ME. Application of ultrasonographic examination of the ovine fetus in normal sheep and those presenting with obstetrical problems. Vet J. 2000;159(3):291-2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/tvjl.1999.0438. PMid:10775476.

Silva P, Uscategui R, Santos V, Taira AR, Mariano R, Rodrigues M, Simões A, Maronezi MC, Avante ML, Vicente W, Feliciano M. Qualitative and quantitative ultrasound attributes of maternal-foetal structures in pregnant ewes. Reprod Domest Anim. 2018;53(3):725-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rda.13163. PMid:29566295.

Vannucchi CI, Rodrigues JA, Silva LCG, Lúcio CF, Veiga GAL. A clinical and hemogasometric survey of neonatal lambs. Small Rumin Res. 2012;108(1-3):107-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2012.05.013.
 

5de5070b0e8825e72e9f5038 animreprod Articles
Links & Downloads

Anim Reprod

Share this page
Page Sections