Animal Reproduction (AR)
https://animal-reproduction.org/article/doi/10.21451/1984-3143-AR2019-0023
Animal Reproduction (AR)
Original Article

Storage of boar semen at 16-18 °C in the long-term commercial extender prepared with deionized water or nanowater

Joanna Szymanowicz; Tomasz Schwarz; Maciej Murawski; Martyna Małopolska; Zdzisław Oszczęda; Ryszard Tuz; Jacek Nowicki; Pawel Mieczyslaw Bartlewski

Downloads: 0
Views: 5

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of nanowater (NW; water declusterized using cold plasma treatment) as a diluent for a commercial boar semen extender during the 15-day storage (Days 1 to 15) at 16-18 °C. Ejaculates collected from 8 boars were subjected to the standard evaluation and then diluted in the extender prepared with deionized water (DW) or NW to a final concentration of 3×109 spermatozoa/ml. The proportion of defective spermatozoa increased (P<0.05) from Day 10 to Day 15 of storage (22.8±16.6% to 41.8±26.4% in DW group and 18.6±11.7% to 34.8±25.4% in NW group) and it was significantly greater in DW group compared with NW group on Days 5 and 10 due mainly to a greater (P<0.05) number of mid-piece defects in semen stored in the DW-containing extender. Sperm progressive motility decreased (P<0.05) in both groups between Days 2 and 6, Days 6 and 10, and Days 10 and 12, whereas the percentage of motile spermatozoa declined (P<0.05) to Day 14 only in NW group. Sperm motility was greater (P<0.05) in NW group compared with DW group from Day 5 to Day 13. A decline in sperm progressive motility below 40% in all semen samples occurred by Day 11 in DW group and by Day 12 in NW group. The mean survival time of sperm at 37 °C ex situ was greater in NW group than in DW group on Day 5 (314±87 min compared with 284±87 min) and Day 10 (223±34 min compared with 182±27 min; NW group compared with DW group, respectively). There were no differences (P>0.05) between the two groups in the concentrations of alkaline phosphatase and aspartate aminotransferase in semen extender. To summarize, the use of NW as an extender diluent exerts cytoprotective effects on boar spermatozoa and delays a decline in sperm progressive motility.

Keywords

pig, sperm, liquid storage, semen extender, nanowater

References

Althouse GC, Wilson TME, Kuster C, Parsley M. Characterization of lower temperature storage limitations of fresh-extended porcine semen. Theriogenology. 1998;50(4):535-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(98)00159-9. PMid:10732145.

Aziz N, Sharma RK, Mahfouz R, Jha R, Agarwal A. Association of sperm morphology and the sperm deformity index (SDI) with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) cleavage inhibition. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(8):2481-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.03.095. PMid:21507396.

Bai N, Sun P, Zhou H, Wu H, Wang R, Liu F, Zhu W, Lopez JL, Zhang J, Fang J. Inactivation of Staphylococcus aureus in water by a cold, He/O2 atmospheric pressure plasma microjet. Plasma Process Polym. 2011;8(5):424-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ppap.201000078.

Boe-Hansen GB, Christensen P, Vibjerg D, Nielsen MBF, Hedeboe AM. Sperm chromatin structure integrity in liquid stored boar semen and its relationships with field fertility. Theriogenology. 2008;69(6):728-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.12.004. PMid:18242673.

Boe-Hansen GB, Ersbøll AK, Greve T, Christensen P. Increasing storage time of extended boar semen reduces sperm DNA integrity. Theriogenology. 2005;63(7):2006-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.09.006. PMid:15823356.

Bresciani C, Bianchera A, Bettini R, Buschini A, Marchi L, Cabassi CS, Sabbioni A, Righi F, Mazzoni C, Parmigiani E. Long-term liquid storage and reproductive evaluation of an innovative boar semen extender (Formula12®) containing a non-reducing disaccharide and an enzymatic agent. Anim Reprod Sci. 2017;180:10-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2017.02.007. PMid:28268040.

Fraser L, Strzeżek J. The use of comet assay to assess DNA integrity of boar spermatozoa following liquid preservation at 5 degrees C and 16 degrees C. Folia Histochem Cytobiol. 2004;42(1):49-55. PMid:15046401.

Gadea J. Review: semen extenders used in artificial insemination of swine. Span J Agric Res. 2003;1(2):17-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2003012-17.

Gagnon C. Controls of sperm motility: biological and clinical aspects. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1990.

Hall SM, Evans J, Haworth SG. Influence of cold preservation on the cytoskeleton of cultured pulmonary arterial endothelial cells. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 1993;9(1):106-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1165/ajrcmb/9.1.106. PMid:8338672.

Harrison RAP, Dott HM, Foster GC. Bovine serum albumin, sperm motility, and the “dilution effect”. J Exp Zool. 1982;222(1):81-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jez.1402220111. PMid:7119705.

Hofmo PO. Commercial swine artificial insemination with liquid boar semen in Norway. Reprod Domest Anim. 1991;1(Suppl):317-20.

Ivanow EI. On the use of artificial insemination for zootechnical purposes in Russia. J Agric Sci. 1922;12(3):244-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S002185960000530X.

Ivanow EI. De la fecundation artificielle chez les mammiferes. Arch Sci Biol. 1907;12:377-511.

Johnson LA, Weitze KF, Fiser P, Maxwell WMC. Storage of boar semen. Anim Reprod Sci. 2000;62(1-3):143-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00157-3. PMid:10924823.

Julák J, Scholtz V, Kotucova S, Janoušková O. The persistent microbicidal effect in water exposed to the corona discharge. Phys Med. 2012;28(3):230-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2011.08.001. PMid:21925912.

Knox RV. Artificial insemination in pigs today. Theriogenology. 2016;85(1):83-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.07.009. PMid:26253434.

Milovanov VK. Artificial insemination in domestic animals. Moscow: Seljhozgiz; 1938.

Murawski M, Schwarz T, Grygier J, Patkowski K, Oszczęda Z, Jelkin I, Kosiek A, Gruszecki TM, Szymanowska A, Skrzypek T, Zięba DA, Bartlewski PM. The utility of nanowater for ram semen cryopreservation. Exp Biol Med. 2015;240(5):611-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1535370214557219. PMid:25491414.

Mystkowska J, Dąbrowski JR. Physical and chemical properties of deionized water and saline treated with low-pressure and low temperature plasma. Chemik. 2013;67:722-4.

Niemirowicz K, Car H. Nanonośniki jako nowoczesne transportery w kontrolowanym dostarczaniu leków. Chemik Nauka-Technika-Rynek. 2012;66:868-81.

Pursel VG, Johnson LA, Rampacek GB. Acrosome morphology of boar spermatozoa incubated before cold shock. J Anim Sci. 1972;34(2):278-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas1972.342278x. PMid:4551736.

Schwarz T, Murawski M, Grygier J, Kosiek A, Oszczęda Z, Tuz R, Nowicki J, Zięba-Przybylska D, Bartlewski PM. A preliminary study of the effects of nanowater on the characteristics of boar semen stored in the liquid phase. In: Proceedings of 7th International Meeting of the Polish Society for Reproductive Biology; 2014; Toruń, Poland. Toruń: Polish Society for Reproductive Biology; 2014.

Silva PF, Gadella BM. Detection of damage in mammalian sperm cells. Theriogenology. 2006;65(5):958-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.09.010. PMid:16242762.

Vyt P, Maes D, Dejonckheere E, Castryck F, Van Soom A. Comparative study on five different commercial extenders for boar semen. Reprod Domest Anim. 2004;39(1):8-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0531.2003.00468.x. PMid:15129914.

Watson PF. The causes of reduced fertility with cryopreserved semen. Anim Reprod Sci. 2000;60-61:481-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00099-3. PMid:10844218.

Windsor DP. Mitochondrial function and ram sperm fertility. Reprod Fertil Dev. 1997;9(3):279-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/R96109. PMid:9261876.

Wood PL, Scoggin K, Ball BA, Troedsson MH, Squires EL. Lipidomics of equine sperm and seminal plasma: identification of amphiphilic (O-acyl)-ω-hydroxy-fatty acids. Theriogenology. 2016;86(5):1212-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.04.012. PMid:27180330.
 

5de508680e882541329f5038 animreprod Articles
Links & Downloads

Anim Reprod

Share this page
Page Sections