Animal Reproduction (AR)
https://animal-reproduction.org/article/doi/10.21451/1984-3143-AR843
Animal Reproduction (AR)
Original Article

A new simple and reliable vitrification device based on Hollow Fiber Vitrification (HFV) method evaluated using IVP bovine embryos

Galina P. Malenko, Ekaterina V. Kornienko, Ivan I. Nesterov, Gleb Yu Kosovsky

Downloads: 4
Views: 695

Abstract

A new vitrification device based on hollow fiber vitrification (HFV) was constructed using a glass capillary, which lead to simplified construction process and increased practicality of the device. The hollow fiber was attached to heat-pulled tip of the glass capillary using forceps. A protective sheath fitted on the capillary provided protection for the cellulose triacetate hollow fiber with loaded embryos and allowed safe storage in liquid nitrogen for long periods of time (2-12 month), transfer between tanks with liquid nitrogen and transportation within these tanks. No embryos were lost in the process. The device was tested using seven-dayold and eight-day-old IVP bovine blastocysts and expanded blastocysts as a model. Obtained survival (90% at 24 h post warming) and hatching rates (62% at 72 h post warming) of day 7 blastocysts and expanded blastocysts were comparable to those gained using various vitrification carriers. Vitrified embryos did not show an increase in the number of cells with damaged membrane or a decrease in total cell number per embryos in comparison to their non-vitrified counterparts. Day 7 and 8 expanded blastocysts did not differ significantly in terms of survival at 24 (97.01 vs. 97.50%) and 48 h post warming (95.52 vs. 95%), but showed significantly higher survival and hatching rates than day 7 and 8 blastocysts. These results indicated that high and repeatable survival rates can be obtained by selection of IVP bovine embryos at the developmental stage of expanded blastocyst for HFV. Further modification of the method may be required to achieve high and stable results with different developmental stages of IVP bovine embryo. The vitrification device presented in the current article may contribute to wider application of HFV method in livestock production.

Keywords

embryo cryopreservation, hollow fiber vitrification, glass capillary device, IVP bovine embryo.

References

Abdalla H, Shimoda M, Hara H, Morita H, Kuwayama M, Hirabayashi M, Hochi S. 2010. Vitrification of ICSI- and IVF-derived bovine blastocysts by minimum volume cooling procedure: effect of developmental stage and age. Theriogenology, 74:1028-1035.

Abe H, Yamashita S, Itoh T, Satoh T, Hoshi H. 1999. Ultrastructure of bovine embryos developed from in vitro-matured and -fertilized oocytes: comparative morphological evaluation of embryos cultured either in serum-free medium or in serum-supplemented medium. Mol Reprod Dev, 53:325-335.

Bavister BD, Yanagimachi R. 1977. The effects of sperm extracts and energy sources on the motility and acrosome reaction of hamster spermatozoa in vitro. Biol Reprod, 16:228-237.

Beck A, Kurome M, Nagashima H, Reichenbach M, Reichenbach HD, Wolf E. 2013. Hollow fiber vitrification of biopsied in vitro produced bovine blastocysts. Reprod Biol, 13(suppl. 2):57.

Dinnyes A, Lonergan P, Fair T, Boland MP, Yang X. 1999. Timing of the first cleavage post-insemination affects cryosurvival of in vitro-produced bovine blastocysts. Mol Reprod Dev, 53:318-324.

Do VH, Walton S, Catt S, Taylor-Robinson AW. 2016. Requirements for cryopreservation of in vitroproduced bovine embryos by a standard method of vitrification. J Vet Sci Anim Husb, 3:1-8.

Gomez E, Rodrıguez A, Munoz M, Caamano JN, Hidalgo CO, Moran E, Facal N, Dıez C. 2008. Serum free embryo culture medium improves in vitro survival of bovine blastocysts to vitrification. Theriogenology, 69:1013-1021.

Gutnisky C, Alvarez GM, Cetica PD, Dalvit GC. 2013. Evaluation of the cryotech vitrification kit for bovine embryos. Cryobiology, 67:391-393.

Han YM, Yamashina H, Koyama N, Lee KK, Fukui Y. 1994. Effects of quality and developmental stage on the survival of IVF-derived bovine blastocysts cultured in vitro after freezing and thawing. Theriogenology, 42:645-654.

Hasler JF, Hurtgen PJ, Jin ZQ, Stokes JE. 1997. Survival of IVF-derived bovine embryos frozen in glycerol or ethylene glycol. Theriogenology, 46:563-579.

Hasler JF. 2011. Effect of embryo stage on pregnancy rate following direct transfer of bovine embryos frozen in ethylene glycol. Reprod Fertil Dev, 24:131.

Huang JY, Chung JT, Tan SL, Chian RC. 2007. High survival and hatching rates following vitrification of embryos at blastocyst stage: a bovine model study. Reprod Biomed Online, 14:464-470.

Kim YM, Uhm SJ, Gupta MK, Yang JS, Lim J-G, Das ZC, Heo YT, Chung H-J, Kong I-K, Kim N-H, Lee HT, Ko DH. 2012. Successful vitrification of bovine blastocysts on paper container. Theriogenology, 78:1085-1093.

Kuwayama M, Vajta G, Ieda S, Kato O. 2005. Comparison of open and closed methods for vitrification of human embryos and the elimination of potential contamination. Reprod Biomed Online, 11:608-614.

Li L, Zhang X, Zhao L, Xia X, Wang W. 2012. Comparison of DNA apoptosis in mouse and human blastocysts after vitrification and slow freezing. Mol Reprod Dev, 79:229-236.

Maehara M, Matsunari H, Honda K, Nakano K, Takeuchi Y, Kanai T, Matsuda T, Matsumura Y, Hagiwara Y, Sasayama N, Shirasu A, Takahashi M, Watanabe M, Umeyama K, Hanazono Y, Nagashima H. 2012. Hollow fiber vitrification provides a novel method for cryopreserving in vitro maturation/fertilization-derived porcine embryos. Biol Reprod, 87:133, 1-8.

Malenko GP. 1999. Device to recover bovine cumulusoocyte complexes (COCs) without destroying their cumulus layers from antral ovarian follicles. In: Proceedings 15th Meeting European Embryo Transfer Association, Lyon. Paris: AETE. pp. 198.

Matsunari H, Maehara M, Nakano K, Ikezawa Y, Hagiwara Y, Sasayama N, Shirasu A, Ohta H, Takahashi M, Nagashima H. 2012. Hollow fiber vitrification: a novel method for vitrifying multiple embryos in a single device. J Reprod Dev, 58:599-608.

Mukaida T, Nakamura S, Tomiyama T, Wada S, Oka C, Kasai M, Takahashi K. 2003. Vitrification of human blastocysts using cryoloops: clinical outcome of 223 cycles. Hum Reprod, 18:384-391.

Nagashima H, Uchikura A, Maehara M, Hatae S, Nakano K. 2015. Direct comparison of the hollow-fiber vitrification and conventional vitrification methods. In: IFFS/JSRM International Meeting, 2015, Yokohama, Japan. Mt. Royal, NJ: IFFS. (abstract).

Nedambale TL, Dinnyes A, Groen W, Dobrinsky JR, Tian XC, Yang X. 2004. Comparison on in vitro fertilized bovine embryos cultured in KSOM or SOF and cryopreserved by slow freezing or vitrification. Theriogenology, 62:437-449.

Park SP, Kim EY, Kim DI, Park NH, Won YS, Yoon SH, Chung KS, Lim JH. 1999. Simple, efficient and successful vitrification of bovine blastocysts using electron microscope grids. Hum Reprod, 14:2838-2843.

Parrish JJ, Susko-Parrish JL, Winer MA, First NL. 1988. Capacitation of bovine sperm by heparin. Biol Reprod, 38:1171-1180.

Pontes JHF, Silva KCF, Basso AC, Rigo AG, Ferreira CR, Santos GMG, Sanches BV, Porcionato JPF, Vieira PHS, Faifer FS, Sterza FAM, Schenk JL, Seneda MM. 2010. Large-scale in vitro embryo production and pregnancy rates from Bos taurus, Bos indicus, and indicus-taurus dairy cows using sexed sperm. Theriogenology, 74:1349-1355.

Rios GL, Mucci NC, Kaiser GG, Alberio RH. 2010. Effect of container, vitrification volume and warming solution on cryosurvival of in vitro-produced bovine embryos. Anim Reprod Sci, 118:19-24.

Romek M, Gajda B, Krzysztofowicz E, Smorg Z. 2009. Lipid content of non-cultured and cultured pig embryo. Reprod Domest Anim, 44:24-32.

Saha S, Rajamahendran R, Boediono A, Sumantril C, Suzuki T. 1996. Viability of bovine blastocysts obtained after 7, 8 or 9 days of culture in vitro following vitrification and one-step rehydration. Theriogenology, 46:331-343.

Saragusty J, Arav A. 2011. Current progress in oocyte and embryo cryopreservation by slow freezing and vitrification. Reproduction, 141:1-19.

Saucedo MN, Kurome M, Reichenbach M, Wolf E, Reichenbach HD. 2015a. Cryopreservation of bovine in vitro-produced embryos: intrinsic factors determining vitrification outcomes. Reprod Fertil Dev, 27(suppl. 1):120.

Saucedo MN, Reichenbach M, Kurome M, Wolf E, Reichenbach HD. 2015b. Vitrification of intact and splitted in vitro produced d7 bovine embryos. Anim Reprod, 12:858.

Shirazi A, Nazari H, Ahmadi E, Heidari B, ShamsEsfandabadi N. 2009. Effect of culture system on survival rate of vitrified bovine embryos produced in vitro. Cryobiology, 59:285-290.

Taylor-Robinson AW, Walton S, Swain DL, Walsh KB, Vajta G. 2014. The potential for modification in cloning and vitrification technology to enhance genetic progress in beef cattle in Northern Australia. Anim Reprod Sci, 148:91-96.

Tervit HR, Whittingham DG, Rowson LEA. 1972. Successful culture in vitro of sheep and cattle ova. J Reprod Fertil, 30:493-497.

Uchikura A, Matsunari H, Nakano K, Hatae S, Nagashima H. 2016. Application of hollow fiber vitrification for cryopreservation of bovine early cleavage stage embryos and porcine morulablastomeres. J Reprod Dev, 62:219-223.

Ushijima H, Akiyama K, Tajima T. 2009. Classification of morphological changes based on the number of cleavage divisions in bovine embryos. J Reprod Dev, 55:83-87.

Vanderzwalmen P, Bertin G, Debauche CH, Standaert V, van Roosendaal E, Vandervorst M, Bollen M, Zech H, Mukaida T, Takahashi K, Schoysman R. 2002. Births after vitrification at morula and blastocyst stages: effect of artificial reduction of the blastocoelic cavity before vitrification. Hum Reprod, 17:744-751.

Zhou GB, Li N. 2013. Bovine oocytes cryoinjury and how to improve their development following cryopreservation. Anim Biotechnol, 24:94-106.

5b7196ba0e882591508068a7 animreprod Articles
Links & Downloads

Anim Reprod

Share this page
Page Sections